Breaking News About the "Liberal Lampson" Campaign:

 

More Hard Evidence of Lampson's Marriage Amendment Flip-Flop

 

Hard Evidence of Lampson's Flip-Flop

 

Two More "Smoking Guns" Nick Lampson Can't Deny...

 

 

Why Rep. Nick Lampson Is "Bought and Paid For" By The Homosexual Lobby...

 

 

Rep. Nick Lampson takes money from homosexual activists and then votes their agenda in Congress.  He has voted against the Marriage Protection Act and supports homosexual marriage- and even wants the taxpayer to subsidize homosexual immigration.  Now, Nick Lampson is again taking money from homosexual activists to pull the wool over our eyes one more time.

Nick Lampson and his homosexual friends probably think Southeast Texans are too stupid to figure out their scheme.  They probably think they can pump in some liberal money from New York and San Francisco, pay for some slick ads, and the "hicks" back in "flyover country" will never figure it out.

The shocking details are below...

If you're concerned about the future of our country, and especially what you can do personally to defend the traditional family, then this might be the most important message you read this election year.

Here's why:

Many people think it's important to re-elect President Bush.  But let's face it: Texas is going to vote for Bush in a landslideThe place where we can really make a difference is in local Congressional races. 

With the huge push this year and last to force states to accept homosexual marriage, I wanted to find a way to get involved to make an impact for pro-family issues.  

However, I assumed that our local representatives were doing the right thing- whether they were Republican or Democrat, I assumed that they would vote against gay marriage and support other important pro-family issues, especially since Southeast Texas is a pretty conservative area...

I Was Shocked When I Found Out That a Liberal Extremist Represented Southeast Texas in Congress

Our representative here in Beaumont is Rep. Nick Lampson, former tax assessor and a career politician, who, despite the conservatism of our area, votes like a New York liberal on issues relating to families (click on the link to verify for each issue):

  • Nick Lampson supports homosexual marriage through politically-motivated doubletalk about his record, making voting commitments to homosexual lobbyists, taking money from homosexual PAC's, supporting "back door" federal legislation with loopholes that recognize homosexual unions, and refusals to curtail activist liberal federal judges from interfering with the traditional definition of marriage- he then lies to his constituents about his positions- find out more about this issue.

  • Nick Lampson voted to allow local funds in Washington, DC to be used to force the Boy Scouts to reinstate two gay leaders and pay them $100,000- Lampson wants homosexuals to have easy access to your children and wants the Boy Scouts to "pay up" for offending the homosexual lobby. Source: HRC Website Scorecard, Description

  • Nick Lampson voted against the Marriage Protection Act (Source: Congressional Record, HR 3313, July 2004)- this bill would have restricted the jurisdiction of activist federal judges over state marriage laws.

  • Nick Lampson voted AGAINST banning homosexuals from adopting children in Washington, DC (Reference: Amendment introduced by Largent, R-OK; Bill HR 2587 ; vote number 1999-346 on Jul 29, 1999)- given homosexuals' notorious promiscuity (i.e. preventing a stable home environment) and their propensity to molest children (crime statistics reveal male homosexuals are 16 times more likely to molest children than the general population), such a policy is a crime against children from a politician that promotes himself as an advocate of children.

  • Nick Lampson voted NO to make harming a fetus a federal crime (Source: Congressional Record, February 2004, Bill HR 1997, Vote 2004-31)- this bill would have stiffened criminal penalties against those who harm a fetus in the commission of a crime.  Lampson is so sold out to pro-abortion extremists that he "towed the line"- extremist groups such as NOW (National Organization of Women) care more about denying fetuses "personhood" under the law than punishing criminals who harm them.

  • Nick Lampson voted NO on banning US foreign aid money to fund abortions overseas (Source: Congressional Record, May 2001, Bill HR 1646, Vote 2001-115)- Lampson wants to export America's Abortion Holocaust to other countries.

  • Nick Lampson co-sponsored HR 1343, a so-called "hate crimes" bill that could make "intimidation" of homosexuals a federal felony (Source: Congressional Record, April 2001)- many conservatives believe such a bill is a "back door" liberals will use to imprison Christians (such as pastors who preach the Biblical position on homosexuality) who speak out against the homosexual agenda. Lampson supports this kind of Orwellian "thought crime" legislation that increases penalties because of the political opinions of the perpetrator- these laws are already on the books in Europe, and many pastors have been imprisoned for expressing or publishing opinions critical of the homosexual "lifestyle."

  • Nick Lampson supports abortion (i.e. the killing of innocent children), yet opposes the death penalty for murderers and cosponsored a bill calling for a moratorium on the death penalty (Source: Congressional Record, March 2001, Bill HR 1038)- typical of wishy-washy liberals, Lampson has a soft spot for thugs on death row (most of whom have previous felonies anyway) but can't bring himself to defend the most innocent victims.

  • Nick Lampson voted for coddling criminals with "alternative sentencing" and supports decreasing funds for building prisons (Source: Congressional Record, June 2000, HR 4690, Vote 2000-317)- again, Lampson has a soft spot for criminals and cares more about funding expensive programs to help felons get in touch with their feelings than keeping the rest of us safe.

  • Nick Lampson cosponsored the Permanent Partners Immigration Act, a bill that would allow homosexual immigrants to bring their partners to the US  (Source: Congressional Record, HR 832)- 70% of Americans want less immigration, but Lampson wants to throw open the borders to millions of homosexuals who will not only take American jobs but also worsen the AIDS epidemic (including free health care once they get here) in our country.

  • Nick Lampson cosponsored legislation that would make employment "discrimination" against homosexuals a federal crime (Source: Congressional Record, HR 2692)- this would make criminals of Christian business owners who want to maintain a Christian and family-friendly work environment. 

You may find it hard to believe that in our own backyard, Southeast Texas, we have a representative as liberal and counter to our values as Nick Lampson.  I was skeptical myself when I first learned of these facts.

But like all things in life, things become clear when you follow the money.

Nick Lampson Sells Out Texas Values for "Thirty Pieces of Silver" from the Homosexual Lobby

As I researched Nick Lampson more thoroughly, I took a look at his campaign finance filings with the federal government to figure who was funding his campaign against family values.  It didn't take long before I found the smoking gun:

The image you see above is what I saw on my computer on August 24, 2004 on the website of the deceptively named homosexual lobbying group "Human Rights Campaign."  The HRC is by far the leading special interest group catering to the homosexual vote.

Nick Lampson is one of six candidates the HRC has targeted as "quality" candidates to advance their anti-family agenda.  Out of 435 members of the House of Representatives, Nick Lampson is one of the six favorites of the most powerful homosexual lobbying group in Washington.

It gets even worse.

If you look carefully at the image above, you'll see that the HRC has instructed its members and supporters to send money to Nick Lampson's campaign.  Note that the HRC website is accessed by users in every state and foreign country.  In other words, they are actively recruiting money from all over the United States (and possibly from foreign countries) to send down to Southeast Texas and attempt to buy off our election in Nick Lampson's favor.  

Most people find such a scheme to be at least deceptive and at worst dishonest.

To date, Nick Lampson has personally accepted over $7000 from the HRC directly, and an untold amount from individual contributors at the HRC website.  This money will be directly used to corrupt our Congressional election.

Why Is Nick Lampson Attempting to Hide His Ties to the Homosexual Lobby Financing His Campaign?

When Nick Lampson isn't enjoying his $155,000 Washington salary paid for by the US taxpayer (in fact, as a career politician, Lampson has milked over $1,000,000 from Southeast Texas taxpayers in lavish salaries from the political positions he's held), he visits his constituents and projects an image as a "hometown leader" who represents the wishes of his constituents.

What he doesn't do is publicize his connections to the homosexual lobby.  In no public statements nor on his website does Lampson ever own up to his associations with anti-family special interests.

Nick Lampson and his liberal friends probably think Southeast Texans are too stupid to figure out their scheme.  They probably think they can pump in some liberal money from New York and San Francisco, pay for some slick ads, and the "hicks" back in "flyover country" will never figure it out.

His behavior is consistent with a career politician who's arrogant and out-of-touch with the people that elected him in the first place.

That's the main reason I decided to do something- it would be a tragedy if Nick Lampson and his liberal friends were able to pull this off.  I hope you'll help me make sure they won't...

Here's Why You Should Help Defeat Nick Lampson's and the Homosexual Lobby's Scheme to Steal Our Election

I know everyone has different political opinions.  That's what makes America great- we argue at election time and then we get on with business.  Even if you don't agree with everything I've said on this site, I hope you'll consider the following:

  • Do you think Southeast Texas ought to be represented by a pro-abortion liberal in bed with feminist extremists?

  • Do you think Southeast Texas ought to be represented by a far-left criminal coddler who wants taxpayers to pay for felons to get in touch with their feelings?

  • Do you agree with Nick Lampson that the death penalty should be halted in Texas?

  • Do you agree with Nick Lampson that we ought to stop building prisons and let dangerous criminals back on the streets?

  • Do you agree with Nick Lampson that people who speak out against the homosexual agenda should possibly be jailed for their opinions?

  • Do you think, as Nick Lampson does, that taxpayer money should pay for abortions in foreign countries?

  • Do you think, as Nick Lampson does, that immigrants ought to be able to bring their homosexual "partners" to America, take American jobs and receive free health care at taxpayer expense?

  • Do you believe that small business owners and other employers ought to be put in jail or fined if they don't want to hire a homosexual, even if it's against their religious beliefs?

  • Do you believe homosexuals should be able to adopt children into their promiscuous lifestyle and indoctrinate them with homosexual propaganda before they are able to think for themselves (not even counting the increased risk of sexual abuse)?

  • Do you believe that liberal, activist judges should be able to force-feed homosexual marriage to states like Texas that don't want it?

  • Are you happy about Nick Lampson's attempt to recruit money from homosexual activists to further finance his lies in this election?

If you answered "no" to any of these questions, then I'm asking you to vote against Nick Lampson.  The Republican candidate is Judge Ted Poe, a tough conservative who is the opposite of Lampson's mealy-mouthed liberalism.

Now, I know some may believe that voting for Nick Lampson is in their interest- you may believe he will help your job or situation in life; maybe your union leader has told you Nick Lampson will represent your interests.  Maybe you agree with conservatives on family issues but think conservatives will hurt your financial interests.  I leave you with the words of the wisest man I've ever known, who said:

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? - Matthew 16:26

To me, the basic issues of marriage, family, abortion, defending children, and just plain honesty in government are so basic that they come before everything else.  Without these basic foundations of our society, money and profit are empty and devoid of value.

I hope I've at least raised your awareness of some issues you will consider when casting your vote.

If you agree with me, here are 3 things you can do RIGHT NOW to make sure Nick Lampson is held accountable for his misrepresentation of his positions...

How We Can Hold Nick Lampson Accountable for His Extremist Liberal Positions

  1. Vote for Lampson's opponent on election day- this is Judge Ted Poe.  You may not agree with Poe on all the issues (or maybe you do), but we can all agree that it's time for someone new.  Nick Lampson and the homosexual lobby must not be rewarded for their dishonest attempt to steal this election.

  2. Tell your friends about this website so they can learn about these issues.

  3. Join our email list so we can send you updates on this site.  We will also send you a model email you can forward to everyone you know to let them know about Lampson's extremist liberal positions and refer them to this website.

Again, I believe this is the opportunity we have to make a difference in the 2004 elections.

Finally, let me remind you of one additional issue: the person we send to Congress every two years is the person that represents our region on the national stage.  Do we really want people to think things like- "I thought Texas was a conservative place, but southeast Texas must be some sort of liberal area because every two years they send this sold-out, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, criminal-coddling liberal to Congress."  Do we really want to be represented by someone who has more in common with a Massachusetts liberal like Ted Kennedy than President Bush? 

I hope you'll consider carefully who you send to represent YOU in Congress.